sandbox

@sandbox@lemmy.world

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Eat lead⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Yeah, it’s not at all a compelling argument.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Oh Elon⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Unpopular opinion, but making fun of people’s name is the lowest form of criticism. It just comes across as a bit juvenile and pathetic, like you’re making fun of a kid in a classroom. Elon Musk is an extreme far right nazi sympathising piece of shit, calling him stupid names just kind of trivialises that, imho.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Clueless about Biology⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  They just eat the other humans remains, duh!

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Twitter⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  The same way that we deal with every other thing that social media platforms restrict. You make it against the rules and then enforce them. If you’re feeling fancy you could program some heuristics to determine the likelihood of a message containing deadnames - for example, maintain a list of common targets, look for people tagging them or related hashtags in tweets containing their dead name, and use sentiment analysis, to determine whether those messages should be subject to moderator approval before appearing publicly.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨I Worked For MrBeast, He's A Fraud⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Since when has being the member of a minority group made it easier for you to get away with committing a crime? Minorities have always been persecuted more severely and more often for crimes than the majority.

  Your comment is like saying that native-born people would pretend to be immigrants to get away with crimes. It doesn’t make any sense. How would that help them?

  Nobody is interested in defending people who are criminals. There should be a burden of proof required for minorities just as there is for non-minorities. The reality we have is that minorities don’t get the benefit of the doubt that non-minorities do, so, if anything, it’s harder for criminals from a minority group to get away with things.

  So yeah, you kind of are victim blaming, I think. LGBTQ+ are the victims of a right-wing hate campaign that labels them as groomers, so when people just assume that accusations are baseless, you’re saying that’s LGBTQ+ people’s responsibility. No, the responsibility is with the hate mob.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨I Worked For MrBeast, He's A Fraud⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I don’t really understand what you’re trying to say. LGBTQ+ people are at far higher risk of being the target of sexual abuse rather than the perpetrators. Why do you think they’d be any more willing of defending that abuse than any other group?

  The police are the group most likely to defend abuse. Why aren’t they being targeted for being groomers?

  Your comment, as far as I can understand it, is basically victim blaming LGBTQ+ people for being harassed by the right wing bigots. They’re not calling LGBTQ+ people groomers because they’ve got a genuine concern. They do it because they want to undertake genocide against LGBTQ+ people.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨I Worked For MrBeast, He's A Fraud⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I’m like 90% sure it’s not true. Right wingers love to accuse LGBTQ+ people of being pedophiles because they’re intolerant little cunts. LGBTQ+ people can of course be pedophiles, but it’s no more likely than cishet people being pedophiles.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Elsevier⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  it’s possible using steganographic techniques to embed digital watermarks which would not be stripped by simply printing to pdf.