otter
@otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- Comment on Leaving Work 2 weeks ago:
Nobody gets out alive, and you can’t take anything with you. 🤘🏼
- Comment on Wreck in the Wheat 2 weeks ago:
Hell yeah, Science! 🤘🏼🤓
- Comment on Soldier Used Classified Information to Bet on Maduro’s Ouster, U.S. Says 2 weeks ago:
Silly citizen. You’re supposed to wait until after you’re in political office for that, son.
- Comment on Wreck in the Wheat 2 weeks ago:
Well, now I’m curious if poppies are legumes like clover and thus contribute nitrogen to the soil, supporting the wheat, et al, around it… 🤔🤓
- Comment on When did we get this old 2 weeks ago:
That’s trauma for ya. 😅🙇🏼♂️
- Comment on When did we get this old 2 weeks ago:
It’s from 2020, and not '91. 😶🌫️
- Comment on liquor is fine though, its the carbonation they worry about 2 weeks ago:
Now, they just bring “factory sealed” water bottles that’re full of clear alcohol, instead, after discovering it’s really not that hard to swap the super-high-tech anti-tamper “solution”. 🤫🤷🏼♂️
- Comment on liquor is fine though, its the carbonation they worry about 2 weeks ago:
Understandably. They do tend toward the kinkier side… 🤘🏼
- Comment on AI company deletes the 3 million OKCupid photos it used for facial recognition training 2 weeks ago:
That’s what I mean. Especially since it’s after the related lawsuit, FFS. This is completely a CYA move, nothing more. They’re just making sure it’s harder to sue them for the same shit and win. 🤬
- Comment on AI company deletes the 3 million OKCupid photos it used for facial recognition training 2 weeks ago:
So, in this instance, “deletes” means “removed from external access”, eh? Clever.
- Comment on Google now lets you have full conversations with Gemini for Home 2 weeks ago:
Ah, so: yes.
- Comment on Google now lets you have full conversations with Gemini for Home 2 weeks ago:
Charming. Is that vibe coding you’ve got under the hood, chatbot? Aww. You seem special.
- Comment on Google now lets you have full conversations with Gemini for Home 2 weeks ago:
I’m not sure if you’re intentionally missing the point, or simply didn’t read it for comprehension. 😅
- Comment on Google now lets you have full conversations with Gemini for Home 2 weeks ago:
“Lets”?! WTF. They need everyone to. Gotta feed the machine so that free/cheap data that no one’s keeping them from, eh? 🤢🤌🏼
- Comment on Thanks for coming to my TED talk 2 weeks ago:
Ded Talk*
- Comment on New Dune trailer or Something. I don't know. 3 weeks ago:
*Shy Whoknewed.
Bless the Meower and His floof.
Bless the coming and going of Him.
May His noodling cleanse the world.
May He keep the blankie warmth for His people…*
- Comment on Underglow Guide 3 weeks ago:
Aww, he’s so adorably intrepid! 🤓🤘🏻
- Comment on You Actually Do Need to Understand Mythos | Hank Green 4 weeks ago:
What are you, some kind of Sith? Pfft. Hank Green is a gawdamned treasure. 🤌🏼😂
- Comment on U.S. Pushes Allies to Chase a New Terrorism Target: The Far Left 4 weeks ago:
If “they” could spontaneously and en masse just hurry up and die of fright, I’d not even pause in sipping my Kermit tea. 🤷🏽♂️
- Comment on U.S. Pushes Allies to Chase a New Terrorism Target: The Far Left 4 weeks ago:
Ohhh, of course terrorism™ as defined by the State is tailored to only mean those that oppose the commercialism, oppression, and actual terrorism that said State approves as on-brand, “patriotic”. Yay, go Team Democracy©! 😅🤮
- Comment on Left side park 4 weeks ago:
Right?
- Comment on Left side park 4 weeks ago:
Wiser to lead with the “if” in those instances.
- Comment on Left side park 4 weeks ago:
And there’s no “left” on a map. 🙃
- Comment on Left side park 4 weeks ago:
That had nothing to do with the decision to raze Seneca Village to make room for the park the bigots wanted, FYI.
- Comment on Left side park 4 weeks ago:
Clicked through to comment this. Thank you for your service. ✊🏼
- Comment on I'm gonna pay you $100 to fuck off 4 weeks ago:
And, you’re assuming that YT isn’t clever enough to cover all the bases? They’re taking money from every side they can think of, and they know damn well that openly talking about ad-blocking inherently risks introducing the concept to new consumers, much less normalizing the whole concept.
YT is clearly juuust fine with money from pretty much anywhere, and I certainly have no delusions that any “premium” service is only temporarily off-limits from that greed. Not just YT’s, either. Netflix & Amazon’ve already done exactly that and completely gotten away with it —to the mildest of whines from the consumer base. 🙄🤮🤷🏽♂️
It’s all smoke & mirrors, and we each have a choice to believe their bullshit or not. You like steak or clarity?
- Comment on I'm gonna pay you $100 to fuck off 4 weeks ago:
Yes, and I didn’t argue that specific point, but you missed the content in the hurry to downvote, friend. I’m not sure what inside connect you have, or skin in the game, but I’m not keen on fishing about in constipated arguments w/ anons, thanks. Have fun!
- Comment on I'm gonna pay you $100 to fuck off 4 weeks ago:
Ad views aren’t sold individually, though views’re certainly involved as a metric. These fucks will take all the money they can, every time, and for as long as they can get away with it. Your “never” there is endearingly naive, no offense, and I do hope that you’re not at all surprised the next time you read/hear about a tech giant emphatically shitting on everyone for profit and getting <1% TR fines when (not “if”) they get caught and taken to court. 🥲🙇🏼♂️
- Comment on I'm gonna pay you $100 to fuck off 4 weeks ago:
It’s the taking of money for both and only doing one that’s the issue, friend. Breathe.
- Comment on Looking for a fight? 4 weeks ago:
Your dick now has stats and, in this area, may be wielded by another combatant. Good luck!