How much screen-time control is actually useful?

Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨sadiquemannan@beehaw.org⁩ to ⁨technology@beehaw.org⁩

I’ve been thinking about how much control people actually need over screen time.

There are plenty of tools that can limit when a device can be used, block certain websites, restrict applications, or provide reports about usage. On paper, having more control sounds better.

But I wonder if there is a point where too many controls make the system harder to manage rather than more useful.

For example, a simple daily time limit might be enough for one situation, while another might benefit more from scheduled access, application restrictions, or website filtering.

There’s also a difference between knowing how a device is being used and trying to control every aspect of that usage.

I’m curious what people think:

If you could keep only three screen-time or device-management controls, which three would you choose—and why?

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

t3rmit3@beehaw.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
For me, there’s no point just controlling screen time for the sake of controlling it, I need to have something actually available and ready to replace it with. Recently I started reading (physical) comics, picking up a couple of the “trade paperbacks” for the Dark Horse Alien and Predator comics. Or re-reading some Gene Wolfe or Tamsyn Muir. Self-imposed technical controls are pointless, to me.

source
Kissaki@beehaw.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
I don’t use nor need screentime control.

It depends on what your goal is.

I see them as very useful when you want to reduce distractions and unwanted habits. Block specific apps during work hours or in the evening.

For parenting, a simple time limit may be enough, or time ranges may be desirable and reasonable or required.

source