As someone that’s maxed out SS most of their carrier while simultaneously assuming I’ll never get SS I’m looking at this a little side eye. Just seems like one last party for the boomers here.
We can save Social Security. Scrap the Cap!
Submitted 1 day ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to workreform@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/29f8d529-c50b-45b6-9366-884b8f86bef4.png
Comments
Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 8 hours ago
Lauchmelder@feddit.org 18 hours ago
no cap fr
Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 15 hours ago
Anti-social security
The_v@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Slight modification.
For SS the employer and employee pay 50/50. So the actual number is double that.
If they lifted the cap the person making $5,176,000 would pay $731,369
Macallan@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
I’m not seeing any issues or downsides to that, they can afford it.
Racoonwithbenefits@lemmy.zip 23 hours ago
Nah you need to raise the payouts from social security too
Akh@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Yeah the cap is based on maximum payout.
searabbit@piefed.social 23 hours ago
Remove the cap on disability income and assets while you’re at it.
AA5B@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Let’s stick with that: “scrap”. You know they’ll eventually “compromise” by raising the cap a little, putting the onus on people who earn just a little more without actually affecting the wealthy. Thats not ok. At some point wealthy people need to pay their share
Omodi@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Social Security doesn’t need saving.
fodor@lemmy.zip 20 hours ago
And tax the ultra rich. If your net worth is over ten million, regardless of your income, you should be contributing big bucks to social security and federal taxes.
Fredselfish@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Yes at 100% tax. No person needs more then 10 million to live on.
Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
90% tax on income over 200k was good enough for America’s golden age. We should try to emulate it.