no cap fr
We can save Social Security. Scrap the Cap!
Submitted 2 months ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to workreform@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/29f8d529-c50b-45b6-9366-884b8f86bef4.png
Comments
Lauchmelder@feddit.org 2 months ago
Racoonwithbenefits@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
Nah you need to raise the payouts from social security too
Akh@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Yeah the cap is based on maximum payout.
Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
Anti-social security
The_v@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Slight modification.
For SS the employer and employee pay 50/50. So the actual number is double that.
If they lifted the cap the person making $5,176,000 would pay $731,369
Macallan@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I’m not seeing any issues or downsides to that, they can afford it.
searabbit@piefed.social 2 months ago
Remove the cap on disability income and assets while you’re at it.
Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
As someone that’s maxed out SS most of their carrier while simultaneously assuming I’ll never get SS I’m looking at this a little side eye. Just seems like one last party for the boomers here.
AA5B@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Let’s stick with that: “scrap”. You know they’ll eventually “compromise” by raising the cap a little, putting the onus on people who earn just a little more without actually affecting the wealthy. Thats not ok. At some point wealthy people need to pay their share
Omodi@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Social Security doesn’t need saving.
fodor@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
And tax the ultra rich. If your net worth is over ten million, regardless of your income, you should be contributing big bucks to social security and federal taxes.
Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Yes at 100% tax. No person needs more then 10 million to live on.
Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 2 months ago
90% tax on income over 200k was good enough for America’s golden age. We should try to emulate it.