Of course the federal government would reject the recommendations when they’re almost entirely state government responsibilities
Albanese government rejects all UN recommendations on improving LGBTQIA+ rights
Submitted 23 hours ago by zero_gravitas@aussie.zone to australianpolitics@aussie.zone
Comments
ryannathans@aussie.zone 22 hours ago
TassieTosser@aussie.zone 20 hours ago
While that’s true, there should be some federal minimums to prevent backsliding in case a bigoted state govt gets voted in.
ryannathans@aussie.zone 19 hours ago
we should undermine the democratic process and state government powers because I don’t like it when the state government doesn’t lean the way I personally want
A very dangerous road to walk
I never thought I’d be defending the coalition but imagine if the coalition federal government (who historically avoid/prevent federal overrides) did this for issues like abortion
Taleya@aussie.zone 22 hours ago
Fuck me, they were like bare minimum decency choices.
shirro@aussie.zone 20 hours ago
Such recommendations need to go to the states/territories in our federal system. For instance conversion therapy is banned in SA, NSW, ACT, Vic. So the recommendations on that should go shit state/territories like WA, Tasmania and NT. Any attempt by the federal govt to legislate outside of its constitutionally defined powers would have to survive a high court challenge. The external affairs power worked for the Franklin dam but that was a specific set of circumstances.
Taleya@aussie.zone 19 hours ago
Curious as to why conversion therapy or private schools would be a state vs federal thing
brisk@aussie.zone 23 hours ago