Comments

• mkwt@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  The cat thing was designed to be as absurd as possible to heckle Bohr and Heisenburg.

  source

  • GiveOver@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    If Schrödinger knew that he was the modern day face of the Copenhagen interpretation, he’d be in a state of both rolling and not-rolling in his grave.

    source

    • diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Image

      source
  • tyranny@crazypeople.online ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    same with the trolley problem. it’s supposed to be so obvious, like asking someone ‘if your friend jumped off a cliff, would you?’ that it shows that it is moral to choose the lesser of two evils. it wasn’t designed to be a debate

    source

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      we’re talking about the intersection between ethics and game theory though. the simple problems (trolley problem, cat dilemma, prisoner’s dilemma) have simple boring answers. It’s once you change the simple problem that it becomes interesting, both in game theory and ethics

      source
  • PugJesus@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Funny how our opponents can give us some of our best tools.

    source
• Fedizen@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Cats are also drawn toward boxes by a mysterious force we do not yet understand.

  source

  • xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Spooky action from a distance

    source

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Meow

      source
• HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  That’s right, they abide by the laws of science. That’s a different publication

  source