The huge proposed increase would be partly offset by steep cuts to domestic programs
Notice how it’s not funded by taxing the rich, but instead by taking things away from the poor.
Submitted 3 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
The huge proposed increase would be partly offset by steep cuts to domestic programs
Notice how it’s not funded by taxing the rich, but instead by taking things away from the poor.
edgemaster72@lemmy.world 3 days ago
“They won’t be using any of those pesky social services when we send them off to die in another pointless anyway, might as well strip the funding now”
— The “pro-life” party and the President of Peace™