Arc linux says opposing age identification is CoC violation.

Comments

• brucethemoose@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I think the source is way better than the talking head, in this case. And more succint:

  I appreciate the work ahead of time, and the law is the law. @svartkanin raised this PR internally within staff channels, and the feedback is that we’ll wait until there’s an overall stance from Arch Linux on this before merging this, and preferably involve legal representatives on this matter on what the best way forward is for us.

  But from a personal reflection it’s clear that there’s a disconnect between law makers intent and how things like this will be implemented in reality, and once a law is in place - we might have to implement inconvenient things…

  So I’ll leave this open for now, but I’ll also lock the conversation because experience from the mailing lists on this topic has told us this thread will get out of hand quickly.

  @dylanmtaylor: this stance does not mean that we won’t merge this. And despite locking this thread, I think you, me and other contributors and maintainers can still comment (which is fine, and good).

  source

  • scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    This guy is particularly bad. I’ve watched his videos a couple of times and he puts a heavily opinionated spin on everything.

    source

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Ugh, then why do posters share it!?

      I don’t get it.

      source
• leviathan@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Can someone tell this Dylan M. Taylor guy (who’s also in favor of Google’s locking down Android btw), that the code he’s pushing is unethical regardless of how private the implementation is?

  kids can drown in the beach, you don’t age-gate the beach!!

  besides, any form of personal information, ANY… is discriminatory

  source
• qaz@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Of course it’s Lunduke

  source