Submitted 1 day ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
It remained unclear why the president believed negative news coverage, which all of his predecessors have faced and is protected by the Constitution, would be against the law.
In a democracy, no.
In a dictatorship, yes.
But it was already clear where things were going.
It remained unclear why the president believed negative news coverage, which all of his predecessors have faced and is protected by the Constitution, would be against the law.
Nah, it’s pretty clear
“If you don’t have anything nice to say, that’s no longer freedom of speech.”
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
So should be be arrested for criticism of Obama and Biden?
pedz@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
What kind of dumb logic is that? Maybe you should be arrested for suggesting your president is not right.
It’s obviously not the same. Everyone loves Trump and nobody likes the Democrats. Everybody knows that the elections that gave Obama and Biden’s presidencies were rigged by the wicked woke antifa ecologists LGBTQ terrorists and therefore illegitimate. They were the real dictators coming for your guns, straws, ‘merry Christmas’, and gendered bathrooms.
It’s that simple.
(/s just in case)
Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Unfortunately, Poe’s law is more applicable than ever. That text is definitely something a MAGA cultist might write.
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
I don’t have a president, although I am not overly fond of my national leaders either.