[deleted]

Comments

• besselj@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Is it really that hidden? If the training data predominantly comes from a website full of white supremacists, it will sometimes sound like a white supremacist.

  source
• HikingVet@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  4 popups in under a minute. Cancer fucking site.

  source

  • thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Saved me a click.

    source
  • spit_evil_olive_tips@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    the sources quoted/linked in the article:

    Maarten Sap told CNN.

    When CNN tested three popular AI chatbots

    CNN asked each chatbot

    KhudaBukhsh told CNN.

    Cameron Berg and Judd Rosenblatt from AE Studio wrote in the Wall Street Journal.

    OpenAI, which makes ChatGPT, told CNN

    it seems pretty clear that this “news” site is just summarizing articles from more reputable outlets so they can get their own ad revenue from them.

    and the cherry on top:

    After the controversy, Musk acknowledged the problem on his social media platform X.

    with a link to...https://x.com. not to any one particular tweet. just a link to the website.

    I had suspicions that this was AI-generated slop, but that proves it in my mind. no human journalist would embed a link like that.

    source
• Gaywallet@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  It really isn’t hidden lol. But you will get countless LLM defenders online who claim you can eliminate the bias with prompting or other hacks which don’t address the underlying issue or do anything but patch a broken system. To fix LLM bias you need to systematically correct, and very few folks have bothered to try and design methods to systematically correct. In the case of Grok, it’s actually explicitly designed to reference Musk’s bigoted musings on subjects first before examining other information.

  source