Dying Light continues celebrating its 10th anniversary with a big graphical facelift, but don't you dare call it a remaster
Submitted 5 days ago by ninelife@lemmy.ca to games@lemmy.world
Comments
VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 5 days ago
[deleted]moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 5 days ago
Personally I wouldn’t say the 2nd was terrible. The first was a better game, but it was helped significantly by free post release updates, which DL2 has gotten a lot of a well. I was pretty impressed with the depth of the city and I like the slow infection aspect. I really miss having a vehicle, but if I remember correctly, there wasn’t a vehicle in the first one at launch and it was added later. Just my 2 cents.
nostalgicgamerz@lemmy.world 3 days ago
What do you mean? The second one comes out in a few months…
There’s is no dying light 2… Only The Beast
GreyCat@lemmy.world 5 days ago
It wasn’t utter shit, or even bad. It just doesn’t hook you like the first one does.
Pandasdontfly@slrpnk.net 4 days ago
I’ve played hundreds of hours of both games. Dl2 has a lot going for it and is an amazing game… On the other hand the story is awful past the first chapter.
Meruten@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
Are they going to patch the ps4 version to not run at 1080p 30fps with thick motion blur on the ps5?
It doesn’t look it like, but they’re still charging £25 for over on PSN.
Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com 5 days ago
Damm it’s kinda bad that there is a logical justification for calling it a retouch instead of remaster and that this argument shits on so many large game companies