‘Tame’ wide British roads and replace them with boulevards of homes, says thinktank

Comments

• RobotToaster@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Aren’t our roads generally much narrower than most other countries.

  source

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Yes. I guess they’re only talking about the wide ones.

    source

    • MapTheft@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      M25?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• snacks@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I like the idea but is this not public land being sold to private property developers? A rethink of road traffic flows in a modern context is fine until we end up making neighbourhoods really crowded with shoebox investment portfolio options

  source

  • mackwinston@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I don’t think the idea is to build houses on the wide roads, the idea is to build them beside the wide roads but remove space for private cars and instead repurpose that space for pedestrians and cyclists (in other words, have wide pavements ideally tree lined but instead of 4 wide lanes of cars maybe 2 narrow lanes with most of the space turned over as a public space for people).

    source

    • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I like your idea, but that’s not what the article says

      Needlessly wide roads should be torn up and replaced with boulevards of new housing

      Only housing is mentioned.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • snacks@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      i hope so. Theres a brilliant video by B1M about Rochester in the US where they removed a 6 lane highway ringroad and it looks amazing theb1m.com/…/america-interstate-highway-system-te…

      source
    • midgephoto@photog.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      @mackwinston @snacks perhaps one motor lane in the centre, with occasional unloading spaces.

      source
• autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  This is the best summary I could come up with:

  ---

  Needlessly wide roads should be torn up and replaced with boulevards of new housing, a thinktank led by the UK government’s most senior urbanism adviser has proposed, in a move likely to delight green belt campaigners but rile the motoring lobby.

  Both initiatives have become lightning rods for wider political debates about personal freedom, inequality and, in some cases, conspiracy theories about shadowy forces attempting to control the population.

  Steve Gooding, the director of the pro-motoring thinktank the RAC Foundation, said narrowing roads would require planners to decide which traffic they no longer wanted.

  “Grand visions need to be backed up by meticulous planning and adequate funding if they are to be turned into a livable reality where our shops are well-stocked, our kids can get to school, and our home deliveries arrive when we expect them,” he said.

  He conceded that increasing the number of 20mph zones meant sweeping junctions and large roundabouts designed decades ago for higher speeds could be revisited, but “it remains to be seen whether linking that with housing development unlocks the scale of investment that’s currently beyond the reach of our cash-strapped local councils”.

  A scheme involving Rochdale council is exploring removing a turning lane from a four-lane urban highway at St Mary’s Gate in the north of the town, allowing designers to create a corner block, and adding 400 homes.

  ---

  The original article contains 579 words, the summary contains 227 words. Saved 61%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  source