That’s assuming they actually do as they say they would after forking over the money
I give my money to hard working entrepreneurs
Submitted 4 weeks ago by sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml to [deleted]
https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d55e9bba-f086-46de-90c3-fc8eb237a0f8.jpeg
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Both of them are bad, the good is to use Open Source alternatives like Krita.
9point6@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I was going to say that Affinity, DxO and DaVinci are right there as free/non-subscription options.
But yeah, going open source is even better, though sometimes a bit of a workflow shift if you’re already used to something like lightroom and you go for darktable, for example. There’s also Rawtherapee for photos but I never tried that one.
I hear kdenlive is a very capable NLE, though I don’t do much video work myself, so I’ve not used it.
InDesign has never struck me as doing much different than any other DTP software, of which there’re plenty of open source options, scribus gets cited a lot
Inkscape has always been pretty decent for vector stuff
Audition has never been much more than a fancy audacity
RandomVideos@programming.dev 4 weeks ago
Are there any good alternatives to adobe animate?
x4740N@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
lemm.ee/comment/18639543
Just incase my mention didn’t work because I use the mention feature very rarely on lemmy
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Krita has some animation stuff built in, don’t know how sufficient it is.