There are very skilled people trying to broker peace. However, for peace to reign everyone needs to agree. For war, one aggressor is enough.
Don't know if this is possible but why don't they get the people who worked out the PLA and Israel deal under Clinton and the Irish Britain agreement to come for a solution to Ukraine?
Submitted 2 weeks ago by Patnou@lemmy.world to [deleted]
Comments
lemmylommy@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Why don’t Russia just fuck off and go home? And while they are at it, give Crimea back.
That’s the only fair peace for Ukraine. But even if Ukraine agree to give up territory, Russia want territory they don’t currently control. Which is decidedly brain dead of them.
The only fair peace is to give Ukraine a shitload of weapons so they can fight back Russia.Patnou@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Out of curiousity can you cite the 1994 pack? Kind of seems one sided …why didn’t they just let the US or any European country take it over? Would it not been hell of a lot better than Russia?
fubo@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Here’s my peace proposal: Putin goes out a window, and Zelenskyy gets to be Tsar of the traditional territory of the Kyivan state.
mystik@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I mean, isn’t the solution pretty simple? if Russia leaves Ukraine’s territory, then Ukraine will stop shooting at Russians? The pretense Russia used to invade was entirely made up. Any concession to Russia, even an inch means that they win, and their tactics work, and they will do it again.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
This is ultimately what it’s about. Any “peace deal” that doesn’t require russia to GTFO and pay restitution for the many billions in war crimes they continue to rack up is just appeasement. It’d be a hard sell at the very least.