I’m going to assume that this is either a PR move, or intended to position Exxon to sabotage any meaningful agreement for emissions cuts.
Well we can be sure that the intent is nefarious
Submitted 1 week ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
I’m going to assume that this is either a PR move, or intended to position Exxon to sabotage any meaningful agreement for emissions cuts.
Well we can be sure that the intent is nefarious
My take is they’ve already established work arounds and if it changes then they’ll loose that leverage, and potentially have a worse deal to work with in the future…not that any Dem will ever hold the majority or oval office again, but maybe.
Imperor@lemmy.world 1 week ago
It’s because it is ineffective and doesn’t have any consequences if they fail. Withdrawing will prompt blue states to push even harder om regulation, as well as the EU possibly waking up. I think they are afraid of the Streisand effect, nothing more.