Submitted 5 weeks ago by Gbagginsthe3rd@aussie.zone to technology@beehaw.org
https://aussie.zone/pictrs/image/791b8ee0-50f5-49bb-8793-5fbf5751deaa.jpeg
Interesting, I wonder if its due to making sure the messages are traceable and staff are accountable. As stated by the authorities
Or is there something they know that we dont? Lemmy has made me paranoid about the security of messaging apps…
(I have no idea how to read code so I wouldn’t have a clue)
This is only on work issued devices or for work purposes. This doesn’t affect personal devices.
Any company allowing the unregulated use of these on their devices has a information protection and most likely also an IT security problem. Even more valid for any government security or law enforcement organisation.
BTW: GDPR prohibits this in the EU.
WhatsApp has been exploited before with a zero-day, check the Complaints section in this link:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pegasus_(spyware)
The reality is WhatsApp and Signal will continue to be high-value targets for exploits given the number of users, cloud infrastructure reliance and promise of secure communications, so it’s a wise idea to avoid them for defence matters.
Best use apps that are less audited and practice security by obscurity?
maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 5 weeks ago
This is a ban of those apps on work issued devices, not personal devices. I suspect there’s a range of reasons for doing this but I don’t think the apps being compromised is one of those reasons. Most likely the opposite, the apps work too well.
Greg@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
Yeah, I’m sure it’s for auditing and being able to respond to freedom of information requests etc