Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

AI companies are pivoting from creating gods to building products

⁨18⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨bot@lemmy.smeargle.fans [bot]⁩ to ⁨hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans⁩

https://www.aisnakeoil.com/p/ai-companies-are-pivoting-from-creating

HN Discussion

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • lvxferre@mander.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Good luck now selling those products, given the negative sentiment around products being advertise as having “AI”.

    source
    • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Eh that one study was mostly about stupid products like “AI coffee machine” or “AI fridge”. AI products that make sense sell pretty well.

      source
      • lvxferre@mander.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        At least acc. to TechSpot, the negative sentiment is general. It’s just more pronounced for some products (high risk and/or price) than others.

        So even where plopping a LLM or similar would make sense, there’ll be likely strong market resistance.

        The fact that plenty actually sensible products are plagued with issues due to GAFAM disingenuousness/stupidity doesn’t help either. (See: Windows Recall, Google abusing search monopoly to feed its AI, etc.)

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • PersonalDevKit@aussie.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Smartphones were a joke until the iPhone. There will be some resistance, but someone will crack the code to make it easily acceptable and then the race is away with the AI products

      source
      • lvxferre@mander.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I do think that some technologies currently being marketed as AI might eventually become features of popularly used products. However:

        1. I don’t think that they’ll come from the so-called “AI companies”. As someone in HN commented the idea of an “AI company” is as ridiculous as a “Python company”.
        2. I don’t think that they’ll be marketed as AI, but as something else.

        As such I partially agree with your conclusion (although I’m not too eager to utter certainty on future events). The reasoning that you used to back it up (analogy with smartphones) is bad though, due to survivorship bias.

        source
  • ravhall@discuss.online ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Can they build a product that will just go out and make money for me? Because that’s the only thing I really want.

    source