cross-posted from: slrpnk.net/post/11061194
Washington Post coverage for comparison (registration required)
Really a contrast with the incredible immunity and power the US courts are willing to give Republican Presidents.
Submitted 3 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
cross-posted from: slrpnk.net/post/11061194
Washington Post coverage for comparison (registration required)
Really a contrast with the incredible immunity and power the US courts are willing to give Republican Presidents.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Many of those states, including Louisiana, West Virginia, Oklahoma, Texas and Wyoming, produce significant amounts of natural gas.
The judge, James D. Cain Jr., who was appointed by President Donald J. Trump, wrote in his decision that the states had demonstrated that they had lost jobs, royalties and taxes that would have flowed had permits for gas exports continued.
Texas, for example, projected that it would lose $259.8 million in tax revenues associated with natural gas production over five years as a result of the pause of permitting.
“The Court finds that the lost or delayed revenues tied to natural gas production is a concrete and imminent injury that supports standing,” Judge Cain wrote.
The Biden administration decided in January to halt approvals of new liquid natural gas facilities after climate activists campaigned against Calcasieu Pass 2, a proposed $10 billion project in Louisiana.
Last week, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission voted 2 to 1 to approve the project, leaving the export terminal permit as the last remaining hurdle.
The original article contains 855 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Veraxus@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Based on the recent SCOTUS ruling, as an official act, he can just say no. And apparently assassinate the judge, provided it’s done in with stamps and signatures on official letterhead. What a horrible timeline we live in.
silence7@slrpnk.net 3 months ago
I don’t for a moment believe that the ruling would in any way protect a Democrat