Submitted 7 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
“The cost of bringing a defamation suit to trial can be enormous, often exceeding a quarter-million dollars’ worth of expenses, to say nothing of the value of attorney time,” […]
Mr. Gottlieb and his team refer to their cases as a “hobby” in service to […]
Insane.
Given the spread and damage of misinformation, maybe it’s time for state prosecution to not only pursue physical danger criminals, but also system society relevant destabliators.
The flipside is British defamation law, where assholes can silence criticism if it harms their “reputation.” Like JK Rowling coercing an apology out of a Twitter user who said her anti-trans rhetoric was once used by the Nazis.
Admittedly the US is less likely to suffer that, exactly, because we recognize truth is an absolute defense against libel. If awareness of your actions harms your reputation… that’s what reputation is for.
F’ing awesome
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Raped. He raped her. NYT, you think you won’t win the frivolous suit the demented rapist will bring? Or are you just doing the usual hedging-on-the-conservative-side that you do to stay ingratiated with money.
Yeah. You’re not brave, NYT.