Banned & Challenged Classics
Submitted 2 years ago by mayonesa@wolfballs.com to freeforum@wolfballs.com
https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/classics?nigger=
Submitted 2 years ago by mayonesa@wolfballs.com to freeforum@wolfballs.com
https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/classics?nigger=
iamtanmay@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
I don't get how these same idiots can want to cancel 'white' books at the same time scream about gay porn LGBTQ books being banned from elementary school curriculum.
They are not very smart.
Maybe they should try some classics from the 20th century, lol
sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net 2 years ago
There's a legitimate argument that they don't care about internal consistency in their arguments because as postmodernists they don't think there's such a thing as truth that can be derived using logic, they only believe in power. Burning your books while screeching about their books being burnt is completely sensible in that view.
iamtanmay@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
Agreed. But they like to present the veneer of 'genuine victimhood' to sway public opinion. That's why dismantling their logic and exposing the fraud/stupidity is worth it.
Otherwise, consider the poor Sri Lankans fleeing their country because their govt listened to climate activists and whole ham ruined their food independence. I do not want my family to suffer likewise due to such Utopians.
mayonesa@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
People with IQs in the 90s cannot understand that stuff. It takes about a 115 to make a dent.