Nonsense. There is a very clear difference between analyzing the contents of a photo for modification and literally just overlaying another image altogether.
‘There is no such thing as a real picture’: Samsung defends AI photo editing on Galaxy S24
Submitted 8 months ago by leo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show to technology@beehaw.org
luciole@beehaw.org 8 months ago
Personally I find the “there is no such thing as a real picture” argument facetious and dangerous. Filters, optimizing zoom and autofocus is not the same as convincingly taking someone out of a scene they were in or putting them in a scene they never were in. One is a purely aesthetic adjustment while they other purports false information. Samsung Generative Edit further trivializes the latter and leaves no indication of the manipulation.
BitOneZero@beehaw.org 8 months ago
While I agree with what you are saying, I think audiences crave the falsehoods strongly, regardless of how the sausage is made. And I know that the technology itself may be regulated for normal consumers, while ‘professionals’ will use their wealth to get another set of technology that does it better. Much like in the USA prostitution is generally illegal, but filing sex for pornography media is legal. There really are not very many preaching to level the playing fields on media production hardware. And if you look at the energy requirements and cost of a high-end GPU just as run-time, you can start to get the sense of how a $15,000 camera is going to be able to do post-production that a consumer smartphone won’t have.