Comment

It’s not whether it’s stupid or not, but that it’s actively belligerent and exposes the antagonism of OP against learning new things. Awful example to set for the community

source

Sort:hotnew top

UprisingVoltage@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
Op does not seem neither belligerent nor antagonistic to me. Maybe rude in their initial statement, but they’ve been interacting with the comments in a perfectly civil way

source
- synae@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
  This is what I’m talking about:
  
  Can anyone succinctly explain <topic>? Everything I’ve read in the past said <stuff>. However I encountered a random idiot on the Internet that claimed <something else>. I immediately rejected this idea because it was counter to what I knew about <topic>.
  
  source
  - JustAnIdiotPlsIgnore@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    What’s wrong with these statements?
    
    Genuinely don’t know what you’re talking about.
    
    This is exactly what happened, how it happened. The idiot I was arguing with kept going back and forth in his arguing, in some comments he would say there is a state in communism, then two comments later he said communism has no state. So yes, the person I was talking to was an idiot, not uncommon (hello my username.)
    
    If this blurb offends you, maybe I was wrong about the conservatives calling us snowflakes.
    
    source