Comment on Totalitarianism. What are the good things about it?

• GreyShuck@feddit.uk ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Why is that a good thing? It would only be good if the results of the decisions were good. Making bad decisions fast would make things worse.

  Decision speed is simply neutral unless there is an associated bias towards good or bad results from those decisions.

  source

  • dope@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Because, all other things being equal, getting where you want to go, quicker, is generally considered to be a good thing.

    source

    • GreyShuck@feddit.uk ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      So that would only be ‘good’ from the point of view of your totalitarian ruler themselves. It doesn’t say anything about whether it is good or bad for anyone else. And - critically - only good as long as your ruler was actually competent enough to get to where they wanted to get to in the most efficient way. If they were not going to be taking opposing views into account they would have to be universal experts.

      source
    • HipPriest@kbin.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      What if they realised they'd made a very stupid decision and if there'd been some more checks and balances that decision could have been avoided?

      The Third Reich, I think we can all agree was totalitarian. Hitler wanted to plunge into a war on two fronts against the USSR drunk on victory against France and expecting to beat Britain. Most of his military advisors weren't keen. But being a Dictator he could just do it and hey presto war against Stalin. As time went on he got more erratic, made more random millitary decisions overruling his generals and made a pigs ear of things but whatever decision he made on a whim happened straight away anyway.

      That's just a famous and obvious example of a totalitarian leader rushing into things and getting where he wanted to go faster which didn't end well for the leader.

      source