Comment on What's dodgy about the proposed Australian political donations reforms? | Constitutional Clarion
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 days agoDid you even read the link they posted? This is pretty bloody convincing evidence, researched by an independent and trustworthy body not influenced by fuckos like Palmer:
yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 5 days ago
I see, I see. But isn’t everyone in agreement that political campaigns should be publicly funded? What is there to be upset about?
spiffmeister@aussie.zone 5 days ago
Would it be a good bill if donations were banned but only the two major parties get public funding?
yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 5 days ago
I don’t believe the bill is doing that, but yes. I’d sacrifice my left nut to get money out of politics.
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
Have you not watched any news on American politics? A two-party system is a cancer to freedom and democracy. All we would be doing is trading one problem, for another much larger problem. The major parties are terrified of the rise of minor parties in the last ~15 years. Neither has held a majority in the Senate since Howard, 2004-2007. That is a good thing.
What you’re suggesting is to throw the baby out with the bath water.
spiffmeister@aussie.zone 5 days ago
You’re right the bill does not do that. The point I’m making is that the way in which you remove money from politics is important, not just the removal of it. If the bill essentially removed the ability for any other group to run other than the two major parties then it’s not a good bill.
Do you think that donations are the only way of biasing a party or candidate? How many have gone to work for consultants afterwards?