Comment on Why is the word "defense" avoided in reporting and rhetorics around Ukraine?
Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It also makes sense for good, honest journalists to use this language. Because they’re trying to be neutral and leaving the opinion forming up to the reader, as far as they can. They want to let the facts speak for themselves. Even if they’re pro Ukraine, they want the facts to convince you to be pro Ukraine, not their phrasing.
So, regardless of whether they’re rage baiting, paid off by Russia, or trying to do honest journalists, it always makes more sense to use neutral language rather than having a pro Ukraine bias.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Saying it is a defense against invaders is being neutral, because that is what is happening. Avoiding a direct statement is the opposite of letting the facts speak for themselves.
Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Not quite, because there’s also (justified) retaliation going on
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That isn’t what retaliation means.
Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 day ago
What does it mean? I’m not a native English speaker