Comment on WILD
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day agofunctionally immortal
Biologically immortal is the term you were looking for
Comment on WILD
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day agofunctionally immortal
Biologically immortal is the term you were looking for
NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 1 day ago
No, I meant functionally. As in practically. For all intents and purposes. As in under normal conditions.
It’s like if I said “You meant ‘searching for’ and not ‘looking for’”, when looking indicates visual searching.
In other words it’s a meaningless distinction in the usage and I would look like a real dickhead pedant if I insisted you use another word.
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Biological immortality is the term for what you were describing. The fact that I politely pointed it out and linked a relevant Wikipedia article of the topic doesn’t warrant you to get insulted and call me a dickhead
NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 1 day ago
There is a functional difference between being pedantic about the word “functionally” and supplying relevant information.
Hackworth@lemmy.world 1 day ago
No, it’s “biologically.”
NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
No, my point with “functionally” is that it can be killed.
Biological immortality is a very specific concept indicating an absence of aging and the absence of an increase in expected mortality along with age.
I just mean that something can still eat it. This is an easy concept to understand if you’re not focused on correcting people needlessly.
Hackworth@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
I was just being a smartass, but I appreciate your commitment to clear communication.