You said it was movement, aka change in position over time, not acceleration, or you would have said “x will accelerate at”, not “earth will move at”. I already explained why it’s questionable as a term of acceleration.
And this could’ve been over after a single comment of you saying “oh, yeah, misspoke”. Your math checks out, that’s not the issue here, it’s your presentation that went all haywire.
literally trivil matter, i didnt even say movement, the point is your statements were still brain rot nonesense and your original comment is wrong and you dont really understand stuff
Clarity of presentation is never a trivial matter. You can be right all you like if you don’t get it across then it will be for nought but inflating your own ego.
barsoap@lemm.ee 1 month ago
You said it was movement, aka change in position over time, not acceleration, or you would have said “x will accelerate at”, not “earth will move at”. I already explained why it’s questionable as a term of acceleration.
And this could’ve been over after a single comment of you saying “oh, yeah, misspoke”. Your math checks out, that’s not the issue here, it’s your presentation that went all haywire.
red@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
literally trivil matter, i didnt even say movement, the point is your statements were still brain rot nonesense and your original comment is wrong and you dont really understand stuff
barsoap@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Clarity of presentation is never a trivial matter. You can be right all you like if you don’t get it across then it will be for nought but inflating your own ego.
Fleur_@lemm.ee 1 month ago
But you’re not right?
You’ve very clearly shown that you are wrong and then said “I’m right because I understand my explanation more than the reality of the situation”