Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g

• red@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  yet another brain rot reply, man i am done,

  ““earth will move with <something with the same units as G>”. Something that’s definitely something, but not m/s” you idiot i was talking about accelwration, if you need units just put in dementions of all the variables, thats trivial stuff you dont understand nlm at all.

  second para is another non technical nonesense

  source

  • barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    you idiot i was talking about accelwration,

    Then why did you say “move” instead of “accelerate”. And the units don’t match acceleration, either. Best I can tell it’s some fraction of a term. If you want it to be an acceleration then you’re missing a squared distance, and if you want it to be acceleration, why are both mass terms in there.

    For someone who throws around things like “that’s non-technical brainrot” damn is your prose fuzzy.

    source

    • red@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      tell me how Gm/r^2 dosent match acceleration, the fact that i wasted my time on low iq person like you

      source

      • barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        That’s not what you wrote, and not what I complained about. You wrote:

        BUT earth will move with gM/m1

        where it was previously established that m1 and M are masses, and I interpreted g to be G (Newton’s gravitational constant) instead of g as in “gravitational acceleration caused by earth” because… well, I’m not actually sure. The whole thing is already a mess of capitalisation but more importantly then it’d be acceleration, not movement, worse, the specific properties of the earth are included twice (once in g, then in one of the mass terms).

        the fact that i wasted my time on low iq person like you

        Maybe you should spend less time on insulting people and more on communicating your thoughts clearly.

        source

        • -> View More Comments