Comment

Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g

<- View Parent

red@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

all that is only brain-rot statements with no technical meaning. lemme make this completly clear

mf= mass of feather mb= mass of ball me= mass of earth ae=accelaration of earth fg=force experienced by both

now in case of feather

force on earth is what? yes thats fg =G.mf.me/r^2

now thats the net force on earth, now what is newtons law? me.ae=G.mf.me/r^2

we get ae=G.mf/r^2

similarly in case of feather ae=G.mb/r^2

and accelaration of earth is clearly more in case of ball, and yes this is accelaration in non inertial frame study newtons laws of motion again if you didnt know, so your second paragraph is utter nonsense

instead of nonsense brainrot statements like 'Multiplication is associative, you can switch the masses around as you please, nowhere in the formula does it say “the greater mass” or “the smaller mass” you could just as well re-arrange the formula and come up with “earth moves with gm1/M” tell me where in equations you think i am wrong

source

Sort:hotnew top

barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
It’s not nonsense when it makes people understand, buddy. And don’t get all “oh be technical” on me when you say things like “earth will move with <something with the same units as G>”. Something that’s definitely something, but not m/s.

source
- red@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  yet another brain rot reply, man i am done,
  
  ““earth will move with <something with the same units as G>”. Something that’s definitely something, but not m/s” you idiot i was talking about accelwration, if you need units just put in dementions of all the variables, thats trivial stuff you dont understand nlm at all.
  
  second para is another non technical nonesense
  
  source
  - barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    
    you idiot i was talking about accelwration,
    
    Then why did you say “move” instead of “accelerate”. And the units don’t match acceleration, either. Best I can tell it’s some fraction of a term. If you want it to be an acceleration then you’re missing a squared distance, and if you want it to be acceleration, why are both mass terms in there.
    
    For someone who throws around things like “that’s non-technical brainrot” damn is your prose fuzzy.
    
    source
    red@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    tell me how Gm/r^2 dosent match acceleration, the fact that i wasted my time on low iq person like you
    
    source
    -> View More Comments