Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g

• barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  That’s not what you wrote, and not what I complained about. You wrote:

  BUT earth will move with gM/m1

  where it was previously established that m1 and M are masses, and I interpreted g to be G (Newton’s gravitational constant) instead of g as in “gravitational acceleration caused by earth” because… well, I’m not actually sure. The whole thing is already a mess of capitalisation but more importantly then it’d be acceleration, not movement, worse, the specific properties of the earth are included twice (once in g, then in one of the mass terms).

  the fact that i wasted my time on low iq person like you

  Maybe you should spend less time on insulting people and more on communicating your thoughts clearly.

  source

  • red@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    tell me how gM/m1 is not acceleration

    source

    • barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      You said it was movement, aka change in position over time, not acceleration, or you would have said “x will accelerate at”, not “earth will move at”. I already explained why it’s questionable as a term of acceleration.

      And this could’ve been over after a single comment of you saying “oh, yeah, misspoke”. Your math checks out, that’s not the issue here, it’s your presentation that went all haywire.

      source

      • red@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        literally trivil matter, i didnt even say movement, the point is your statements were still brain rot nonesense and your original comment is wrong and you dont really understand stuff

        source

        • -> View More Comments