Comment on There are Minimum Wages, Why Not a Maximum Wage?

• Badeendje@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I agree that if there is anywhere to start it is taxing assets like stock portfolios and other vehicles the billionaire class uses to avoid taxation.

  The whole trickle down economics did not work, it’s time we start trying rising tide economics, as it lifts all boats.

  But anti labor is a stretch depending on where you draw a line. There are amounts that cannot be explained by mere labor.

  source

  • GBU_28@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    So some dude accused me of being a troll and I’m certainly not, and I’m certainly interested in this topic. I just care about taking actual actions to affect change.

    I believe this would shield the hyper wealthy from further fairness, they would hide behind this.

    I further believe this would be corrupted to manipulate true laborers by targeting different professions and tax classes after the fact.

    source

    • Badeendje@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      So we have common ground on the fact the primary focus is the robber barons. Any changes should start with addressing the avenues only the robber barons have to avoid taxation and work their way down.

      But slippery sloping the fact there are people out there with millions of dollars of “salary” is also nonsense. CEO’s do not add that kind of value, there is a big network component at work.

      Then there are several different scales for the first 100K of income to differentiate, but then above that it stops… F- that… if there is a top scale it should be at 99%. Just watch how quick there will be intermediate scales. But no one will be able to convince me that salaries above a certain amount can be defended. Where that amount is… I don’t know… it can be high… but a ceiling is easily defendable.

      source