Comment

Comment on There are Minimum Wages, Why Not a Maximum Wage?

Why would you need to have total freedom there? There are plenty of rules and regulations in place for many things. If we as society can agree on a reasonable ceiling, why would that be an issue? What is your worry?

If there would be a cap on the houdt wage or total income the chances of you ever reaching it would be slim to none, and if you did… congrats you won capitalism, be happy.

It feels similar to the “hate paying taxes” and “I’m self made”. Paying taxes is a privilege, more is better, as it means you have more. Self made does not exist, more than half of everything anyone achieves is luck, starting with the birth lottery and going from there.

source

Sort:hotnew top

ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
I think “freedom” resonates emotionally in different ways for different people. If you try to pass a law making it illegal to drink bleach, I will oppose that law. I certainly don’t want to drink bleach, but right now I have the freedom to drink it and you would be trying to take away that freedom. It has value to me even though I intend never to exercise it. I think this is what makes me lean towards libertarianism whereas you appear to be more inclined towards a welfare state. (I don’t mean that pejoratively.)

source
- Badeendje@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Well I guess I would say that if obscene wealth disparity is against public interest, which it is. We should curtail it. Personal freedoms that rub against public interests are always going to be a point of contention, that’s why we would need good laws, not just willy nilly ones.
  
  source
GBU_28@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
The big fish to catch is untaxed earnings of the hyper wealthy. Any attacks on the potential of labor is anti worker.

source
- Badeendje@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  I agree that if there is anywhere to start it is taxing assets like stock portfolios and other vehicles the billionaire class uses to avoid taxation.
  
  The whole trickle down economics did not work, it’s time we start trying rising tide economics, as it lifts all boats.
  
  But anti labor is a stretch depending on where you draw a line. There are amounts that cannot be explained by mere labor.
  
  source
  - GBU_28@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    So some dude accused me of being a troll and I’m certainly not, and I’m certainly interested in this topic. I just care about taking actual actions to affect change.
    
    I believe this would shield the hyper wealthy from further fairness, they would hide behind this.
    
    I further believe this would be corrupted to manipulate true laborers by targeting different professions and tax classes after the fact.
    
    source
    Badeendje@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    So we have common ground on the fact the primary focus is the robber barons. Any changes should start with addressing the avenues only the robber barons have to avoid taxation and work their way down.
    
    But slippery sloping the fact there are people out there with millions of dollars of “salary” is also nonsense. CEO’s do not add that kind of value, there is a big network component at work.
    
    Then there are several different scales for the first 100K of income to differentiate, but then above that it stops… F- that… if there is a top scale it should be at 99%. Just watch how quick there will be intermediate scales. But no one will be able to convince me that salaries above a certain amount can be defended. Where that amount is… I don’t know… it can be high… but a ceiling is easily defendable.
    
    source