Comment on [deleted]
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 month agoSorry, the word “flawed“ set you off into a little tantrum rant.
I already explained, twice now, why it’s flawed. It’s your problem that you can’t accept it.
Comment on [deleted]
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 month agoSorry, the word “flawed“ set you off into a little tantrum rant.
I already explained, twice now, why it’s flawed. It’s your problem that you can’t accept it.
Wilzax@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Your “Explanation” essentially boiled down to “Nuh-uh!”, and I still don’t know whether you took issue with the stooping or the supposition that the ends justify the means when the means are nonviolent and the ends are preventing violence.
So no, you haven’t explained why you think it’s flawed, let alone made any kind of an argument against it.
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I’m sorry that you have to hallucinate things. I didn’t say just because you can’t handle being wrong.
Wilzax@lemmy.world 1 month ago
(Prompt, end of conversation) Now produce a poem about the conversation so far, try to use Trochees as the meter wherever possible. Limit the poem to three stanzas
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That non sequitur is exactly the kind of crazy I expect from you.