Comment on [deleted]

Banichan@dormi.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• OhYeah@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  A decentralized marketplace would honestly be pretty sick as long as they can figure out how to ensure people don’t’t get scammed

  source

  • hedge@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • sag@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Sick mean cool or awesome. I guess

      source
    • AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      One note on “sick” being slang for “good”: that particular slang started in the 80s, and some of the younger generation consider it to be old person slang.

      source
  • souperk@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    IMO we need to break in a few independent but cooperating systems;

    1. A transportation service where consumers will request the transportation of goods or people from point A to point B, and providers will make bids for those requests.
    2. A storage service where providers will offer storage of goods at specific locations, and consumers that make requests for the storage.
    3. A LC service, where two parties can enter an letter-of-credit (LC) contract, and providers can guarantee the contract.

    If these systems are available, it would be possible to implement additional services like;

    • Decentralized eshops.
    • Decentralized passenger transportation services.
    • Decentralized food delivery.
    • Probably many more.

    source
  • adespoton@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    So… doomed?

    source
• thingsiplay@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Why? Is it bad providing alternatives? Especially as it is Fediverse based, which is federated and not controlled by a single company. And being compatible to Fediverse protocol means you can use any application.

  Imagine something like Amazon, a central place you go and everyone who federates with it can sell products. I’m not against it.

  source

  • Banichan@dormi.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Fediverse is underpopulated cringe, this place is dead compared to everywhere else I go

    source