Comment on Why is everyone so giddy about the flooding thay happened at burning man?

• Blackmist@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Everything is “carbon neutral” on a long enough timescale. One of many reasons why that expression is 100% unadulterated bollocks. If you’re an airline, you can’t just offset the damage you do by paying a Bangladeshi farmer two dollars to throw some tree seeds on the ground.

  source

  • Scribbd@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Burning man should become Burried man. Everybody should dig a hole and burry the wood. That is carbon capture.

    I am not an expert. So this could just be a naive take. I wouldn’t be surprised burying wood actually amplifies the carbon emissions due to some reactions with soil, or something.

    source

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I would think the biggest pollutant there would be all the fuel.

      Getting there and back (and the location could be charitably described as the arse end of nowhere), all the rented RVs with the air con running… Burning a wooden effigy wouldn’t even come close.

      source
    • DarthBueller@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I mean, decomposition releases methane over time, slower than burning does, but buried wood in the desert is more likely to petrify than rot. There’s a lot to be said for burying wood in certain situations. Hugelkultur (making agricultural/garden mounds out of wood and soil) if done right can do amazing things (everything from creating microclimates that increase biodiversity to supercharging the soil with beneficial fungi/bacteria, to increasing water retention).

      source