Comment on So bad it was actually entertaining
Letstakealook@lemm.ee 1 month agoThree good was good, but they were out of many options, and the service was bad. The owner then responds, telling them to kill themselves. I’d say the one star is for the food. Otherwise, they’d get a zero.
Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
I would like to point out that a one star is technically 0. A five star review on Google is a rating of zero to 4. As a one star is automatically a given, one can assess an accurate rating by subtracting one from all ratings and understanding it’s a four star system in disguise.
Google says this restaurant is a 4.2 rating? That’s a 3.2 out of 4 possible stars. The ratio is corrected.