Comment on Not everything needs to be Art
Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 month agoWhy are you attaching all these convoluted characteristics to art? Is it because you are otherwise unable to claim computer art isn’t art?
Art does not need to have intent. It doesn’t need philosophy. It doesn’t need to be made by a sentient being. It doesn’t need to be 100% original, because no art ever is. So what if a computer created it?
If you encounter an artist who never saw a cat, they would also not be able to paint it. Just look at these medieval depictions of lions where it is clear the artist never saw one.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Also, Dürer’s Rhino.
Image
But he tried. That’s the important thing.