Sorta makes it pointless.
The victims most effected are the least likely to find the idea helpful.
Comment on No More Empty Docks, Offenders Forced to Face Victims
Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year agoThe victims don’t have to, but if they choose to, the accused person has to sit in the dock.
Sorta makes it pointless.
The victims most effected are the least likely to find the idea helpful.
I don’t know. Some people find it therapeutic to see the person punished. It can help get closure. The way some sentences are though, it might leave them feeling disappointed instead.
Blake@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Ah okay, that makes it a bit better. What about if the victim has to give evidence at the trial or something, though?
JoBo@feddit.uk 1 year ago
They can give evidence from behind a screen or sometimes video link.
Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
I don’t know, but I would imagine that they can either remove the accused while they give evidence, or they can give video evidence
Blake@feddit.uk 1 year ago
I have read horror stories about this happening in the US, where victims of terrible crimes can be cross-examined in a dehumanising or intimidating way by the person who harmed them if they choose to defend themselves. It’s really disgusting.
Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
It’s a tricky one, because there are cases where the accused is guilty, cases where they’re innocent, and cases where they’ve been deliberately falsely accused. Until the trial, they can’t fairly be separated, so they should have the right to defend themselves, but, as you say, this can mean that an innocent person is put through something awful by the person who hurt them in the first place.
I’m just glad that I don’t have to write the rules around that.