Comment on Steam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you'

• Grimy@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  There’s not enough nuance to justify drinking Gabens sweat.

  Why is he the only billionaire that gets his own little simp squad. Can you imagine going into a thread about how Elon Musk is being a dick and 90% of the comments are praising him?

  Amazon is super convenient, yet people still can understand the nuance of it and how it’s harming small businesses, how the government should probably do something and deal with the dragon at its head that’s hoarding all that wealth.

  Where’s your nuance? Other than “I like steam and I use it, so it can do no wrong”.

  source

  • null@slrpnk.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The nuance is here in this thread, in multiple comments that have clearly demonstrated that you have no idea what you’re talking about.

    But you’re too busy backpedaling and jerking of about how much you hate billionaires to actually engage with any of those points.

    source

    • Grimy@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      They charge 30% because they have a soft monopoly, it’s basically robbery and it is affecting the indie scene and the quality and amount of games we receive.

      Gaben has 6 mega yatchs and a number of submarines. The yatchs alone are worth around 1 billion and cost an estimated 75 to 100 million per year just to maintain.

      This is from my first post, I’ve repeated myself 4 times now. I won’t be answering anymore of your comments. All your spitting in my face is childish rhetoric.

      source

      • null@slrpnk.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Oh look, another boring block of text so you can avoid replying to the commentor who proved you’re either dumb or just lying.

        We get it, your point can be dumbed down to a mouth-breathing “capitalism bad”.

        source

        • -> View More Comments