It’s broken. Every image has over 90% artificial rating.
Comment on Artifical Intelligence
mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Friendly reminder that my AI-generated image detector is available to use free of charge here: huggingface.co/spaces/umm-maybe/sdxl-detector
AsudoxDev@programming.dev 1 month ago
mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
If you don’t mind, I’d be interested to see the images you used. The broad validation tests I’ve done suggest 80-90% accuracy in general, but there are some specific categories (anime, for example) on which it performs kinda poorly. If your test samples have something in common it would be good to know so I can work on a fix.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Except these are very prone to false positives.
mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I find it very funny that people are so concerned about false positives. Models like these should really only be used as a screening tool to catch things and flag them for human review. In that context, false positives seem less bad than false negatives (although, people seem to demand zero error in either direction, and that’s just silly).