Any time you’re anti-choice, you’re probably in the wrong…
Comment on Anon wants to stop the mad painter
todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 3 days agoI’m saying that by giving a choice at all, you’re already failing the players that don’t want it.
“It’s not enough that I can choose not to have yellow paint, I should be able to choose for everyone else too.”
Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 days ago
Randomguy@lemm.ee 3 days ago
Imagine you have to go to the grocery store (interact with an item), but it’s far, so you can’t (the game has bad readability).
Someone makes cars (yellow paint).
Post OP says: fuck cars (yellow paint).
Comment OP says: I think we should be able to choose between having cars or walking (having yellow paint or not).
I’m saying: this option sucks (having yellow paint or nothing), we should have good public transport instead (good art/environment design that doesn’t cause confusion).
Is that a hot take?
bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 2 days ago
It’s really tame what on earth is with the downvotes
Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 days ago
Hey buddy, FUCK YOU!!! I’m gonna downvote your tits off!
(And they say the internet raises anonymous hostility in online discussions)
todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 2 days ago
Okay, I don’t like cars either, and I don’t own one. I also acknowledge that most people have cars and want to use them. I can still walk to the grocery store, I do it literally every time I go. People are still driving cars, and I’m still walking.