Thanks for the suggestion. I actually have been considering blocking that user.
Comment on My thoughts on Hexbear. Posting as the megathread was locked.
Zeus@lemm.ee 10 months agoWell yeah I guess I should have expected this coming lol. But to be fair I don’t think me commenting on cth justifies their personal insults.
no, it doesn’t. but it also doesn’t justify you demanding that l.ee blocks them entirely. personally, i haven’t had any bad experiences w/ hexbear, and i’m subscribed to at least one of their lemmyspheres.
Also, another half of personal insults happened on !worldnews@lemmy.ml.
yeah, that i can’t (and have no plans to) defend. but my i did skim the thread i believe you’re talking about, and whilst some of your ripostes are quite good; my advice would just be to block AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net and just not engage. just walk away from the computer and make a cup of tea. i know that’s what i do
if you feel like being courteous you can tell the person that, or you can just block them and not respond
randint@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Zeus@lemm.ee 10 months ago
yeah don’t consider it. maybe it’s just me being influenced by tumblr cultr, but 1) he won’t know, 2) there’s no point in arguing with someone if neither of you are going to change the other’s mind, 3) it harms no-one. just block anyone you don’t want to talk to
i’ll admit i almost never blocked anyone on reddit, but there were so many people it was kind of useless. here it actually can make a difference to your experience, i think
GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 10 months ago
I appreciate your dedication to being constructive about things
randint@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Thanks. I just blocked them, along with the person who told me to post dick pics (as screenshotted in my edit to the post)
Serinus@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Blocking doesn’t solve the problem. The effect on OP is less important than the effect on others.
They’re both trying to intimate to prevent posting they don’t like and they’re trying create a false “consensus” that serves to spread propaganda. They do this largely through the number of replies and not through any kind of substantive argument.
It’s a propaganda instance using clear propaganda techniques and should be blocked. We can be open to alternative “ideas” if they don’t include the cheap influence techniques.
The instance should be defederated.
Nakoichi@hexbear.net 10 months ago
They are literally lying to you. They are still defending a modern Nazi. By defending any of Zenz views on non-white people they are by definition doing Nazi apologia. The problem lies in that they had this pointed out and doubled down. I have plenty of critiques on China that aren’t really relevant here, because my opinion of China isn’t really on trial here. I am mostly concerned with the specific arguments and angle this user is coming at this with.
Much in the same way that there is a difference between someone criticizing George Soros for being a capitalist vs. Nazis who hate him because he is Jewish and wealthy.
Zeus@lemm.ee 10 months ago
nakoichi, i don’t care. i, too, read the post. i’m not taking sides in an argument between you and randint: i’m saying that i like hexbear and i dont’t want to defed them, and if randint doesn’t like you i’m advising him in how not to get drawn into an argument
GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 10 months ago
I think your conclusion is right but I think a more sound reasoning is that Zenz is plainly a christofascist and randint is defending Zenz by trying to argue that the Nazi sympathizing doesn’t influence the validity of other geopolitical claims. That definitionally makes him a fascist apologist.