Comment

Comment on The burning of the Library of Alexandria for fandoms

From a content creator’s standpoint, sure. The issue is that when the end user doesn’t have a shiny new thing they’re interested in in front of them every 30 or so seconds they just log off and stop using the service. Why use mastodon if bluesky/threads/whatever shows them, generally, more of what they want to see and less of what they don’t?

Most people are using social media as a way to veg out and unwind these days. They don’t really care if somebody is able to game the system, just that they see more that lets them veg out (or alternatively makes them angry, driving increased engagement).

I agree that this is generally bad, but trying to sidestep it completely like Mastodon is is just going to result in a network that never hits the critical mass necessary to start exponential growth.

source

Sort:hotnew top

davehtaylor@beehaw.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I would disagree. Bluesky has no algorithm and it’s growing quite rapidly. And I think that a large part of that is just having the people there that one might want to follow, and fosters community and conversation. A place like Threads absolutely does not do that. Mastodon is just an impenetrable mess from a UX perspective. The average user doesn’t care about federation and needs a solid and understandable entry point. Bluesky is federated but 90% of the people there have no idea what that means.

but trying to sidestep it completely like Mastodon is is just going to result in a network that never hits the critical mass necessary to start exponential growth

If keeping algo-gaming engagement bait off the platform is a price a platform has to pay, then I’m happily willing to accept that.

source
- FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Bluesky has an algorithm
  
  source
- CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  Mastodon is just an impenetrable mess from a UX perspective.
  
  How does it compare to Lemmy?
  
  source