I clearly explained it to you. You seem to think the popular vote is how elections are won. It’s cute but not factually accurate.
I clearly explained it to you. You seem to think the popular vote is how elections are won. It’s cute but not factually accurate.
glimse@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You can’t read. I’m saying the popular vote is how the president SHOULD be decided and I’m asking in what way the electoral college is better. Your only suggestion so far holds about as much weight as an anti-tiger rock (“we’re still a union so it’s a good thing”)
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 month ago
I explained why it’s better. It provides a more equal footing for the states. The popular vote shouldn’t be used as it’s a stupid idea. It’s against the structure of our country. We are a republic. We are not a democracy. The founding fathers hated democracy. They knew we needed rails to keep the system working.
glimse@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Nowhere did you explain why it’s better and now you’re continuing to dance around the point.
Quit the bullshit and answer this concisely:
Why is a system where citizens in a few states to have disproportional power better than one where individuals are equal?
And don’t just vaguely gesture at the country again. Worse systems have lasted way longer so “see? It clearly works!” is not a valid argument.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 month ago
I explained why it’s better. Stability. Not sure why that answers seems to confuse you. It’s the stated reason for the system. A popular vote would destroy the country within a few elections. No thank you.