Comment on We can post about feeding on them just not about feeding them
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week agoveganism eschews all exploitation. there is no carve out for consent in the vegan society’s definition
Comment on We can post about feeding on them just not about feeding them
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week agoveganism eschews all exploitation. there is no carve out for consent in the vegan society’s definition
Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
It’s implicit. If consent was given, it wouldn’t be exploitative. (And obviously, that’s contingent upon non-coersion.)
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
common definitions of exploitation make no mention of consent either.
Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
What? Where are you looking, the dictionary?
plato.stanford.edu/entries/exploitation/
Consent is mentioned plenty.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
three mentions across 2 paragraphs. all of the mentions imply that consent would somehow relieve accusations of exploitation, but that isn’t established in your article for a certainty, and at best i’d say it’s debatable. i don’t care to debate about it. it’s clear that the vulgar use of the term is unrelated entirely.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
encyclopedias are not dictionaries