Comment on FBI busts musician’s elaborate AI-powered $10M streaming-royalty heist
otter@lemmy.ca 1 week agoIt does help set a good precedent. When companies try to do the same thing, further hurting smaller artists, we can point to this case
Comment on FBI busts musician’s elaborate AI-powered $10M streaming-royalty heist
otter@lemmy.ca 1 week agoIt does help set a good precedent. When companies try to do the same thing, further hurting smaller artists, we can point to this case
ravhall@discuss.online 1 week ago
But corporations rarely get punished. So, I see a small fry taking advantage of a loophole to make money.
Granted, this person really should have quit before they got noticed. You get caught when you get greedy.
teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
It’s not a loophole, though. Their ToS specifically prohibits creating artificial streams. The guy isn’t going to get away with it. The AI generated music isn’t a problem, but spinning up bots to give it streams is the same as using click bots to farm ad revenue. If the man catches you, the man’s gonna win.
Vulfpeck made a silent album and asked fans to stream it nonstop. THAT was a loophole, because there wasn’t anything spotify could do, it wasn’t anything in their agreement that said they couldn’t do that, and that’s awesome. Spotify (and the others I assume) has since plugged that hole, but I applaud them for taking advantage while they could.
Yeah, I have to think there are others out there doing this same thing at a smaller scale, being more subtle about it, and not getting caught. This guy just got a bit too greedy.
ravhall@discuss.online 1 week ago
TOS is not law.
teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
ToS was the wrong term. Artists agree to a contract when they monetize their content on Spotify. The contract specifies exactly what the artist will be paid for. If the artist was misrepresenting facts in order to be paid more than the contract would otherwise stipulate, it’s called fraud, and that is a crime.
Artificial streams are not new. Spotify has many articles dedicated to describing the problem of artificial streams, and the penalties for artists engaging in it. Here are One, Two, Three of them just from a single search.
This is a loophole in the same way that you can take stuff when the owner isn’t looking is a loophole. In other words, it’s just called a crime.