You have to specify which part you’re referring to
What do you mean by that?
Comment on How did people refer to clockwise movement before the invention of the clock?
FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 year agoIt works, but it’s ambiguous. You have to specify which part you’re referring to if you want to be sure you’re understood.
You have to specify which part you’re referring to
What do you mean by that?
No matter which direction a ball rolls, part of it moves to the right, and part to the left (either top right and bottom left, or vice versa). If you don’t specify which part of the ball you’re looking at, it could be either top or bottom, so the statement is ambiguous.
but without this information, clockwise and anticlockwise also ambigous.
No, they are well-defined. There is no missing information in “clockwise”. There is missing information in “right”.
Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social 1 year ago
Honestly the hardest concept for me to grasp in organic chemistry was left vs right chirality. I could understand why they were different, but fuck me if i could ever consistently identify them.