4/10. The immediate extreme response is a solid opener. I do like how you bring the entire fediverse into it which could broaden the appeal. However this is much too short and not nearly unhinged enough for a good copy pasta. Sentence structure is too proper, too. Maybe try some good run ons, add at least two more paragraphs, and include completely irrelevant topics with no attempt to link it to what you’re replying to. I’m proud of how well you do and think you can go places with some practice
Comment on Oh, the humanity!
pigslop@lemm.ee 4 weeks agoMan I fucking hate this garbage fediverse shit. Literally worse than reddit. Cannot post anything without some sweaty unwashed asshole reading way too far into what you said and then getting mad at you, over their own imagined shit. FUCK OFF I’M NOT DEBATING YOU THIS IS NOT A SERIOUS TOPIC AND YOU’RE A FUCKING JOKE
ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
I love how this comment describes itself.
Sagittarii@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
Calm down bro 😭 it’s a reasonable thing to point out when presented with “Our ability to destroy is the trait that has powered our rise”
Maybe could’ve done without the “The fuck are you on?” though I guess
QuietCupcake@hexbear.net 4 weeks ago
To me it’s honestly a disgusting thing to claim that human progress and creativity is all based on destruction when in reality it’s the exact opposite. I don’t think my response was at all over the top given how harmful of a sentiment I think that is.
This stuff matters. Our biosphere is facing destruction at human hands but not because of our desire to create and build things, not because of our ability to express ourselves through our ingenuity to shape stone and wood. Those are not “destructive traits” but profoundly constructuve attributes. The destruction on the scale that it’s happening now to both the environment and much of human culture is because of, like I said, a social pathology that’s rooted in a system that rewards greed instead of trying to prevent it. It is a pathology that tries to equate greed and destruction with the creative aspects of human nature… just like the comment I responded to was doing. It’s a lie. Even if someone who has fallen for it may be well-meaning, they’re still perpetuating a very harmful (and destrctive!) misconception. So I think it deserves a strong, even emotionally-charged critical response.