What an empty comment, smuglord.
Comment on Actors demand action over 'disgusting' explicit video game scenes
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 weeks agoIf you don’t want to act them out, then simply don’t. You have a union to back you up
That’s not always the case in the moment.
That being said, these sort of scenes definitely need to be negotiated and talked about long before minutes before acting it out. I fully agree with such a sentiment
…so you actually agree with what they’re trying to do but still felt like misrepresenting it for a few sentences before saying so?
Weird choice, but at least you reached the right conclusion at the end 🤷
bastion@feddit.nl 4 weeks ago
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Just pointing out the logical inconsistency of going off on an irrelevant tangent about prudishness and then in the same comment support what it’s ACTUALLY about.
That’s not empty. Unlike your comment, hypocrite.
bastion@feddit.nl 4 weeks ago
My comment was concise, clear, and accurate, and I stand by it.
I also don’t agree with the OP you responded to, but they at least had thoughts - and, more to the point, weren’t a total smuglord.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
My comment was concise, clear, and accurate
Well, you’re right that it was concise, at least…
they at least had thoughts
As did I. Using strawmen like injecting an irrelevant argument about censorship matters. It’s dishonest and misleading and that’s what I was commenting on.
and, more to the point, weren’t a total smuglord.
That’s just your hypocritical opinion 🤷
Harvey656@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Misrepresenting? Please elaborate how I’m doing such a thing, there are two issues here: the subject of the scenes, and the not being told about the subject.
I have my two cents on each subject, you can agree or disagree with what I say, but saying I was Misrepresenting anything is flat out lying about my comment.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
That’s how. By inventing the first issue. Nobody’s arguing for censorship. It’s only about the right to informed consent.
Nope. You were inserting a strawman argument about censorship. That’s by definition misrepresenting.
jeffw@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I feel like sometimes people comment, then read the article, and then try to backpedal when you point out that they missed the point of the article. Thanks for calling it out though