Comment on Why are people downvoting the MediaBiasFactChecker not?
tyler@programming.dev 5 weeks agoNot if they don’t provide a link to the news source they’re talking about. So yeah, still no proof, source, nothing. Pretty clear it’s your bias at this point.
Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
So you’re too lazy to check the cross reference of BBC and the Ayn Rand Institute on MBFC and too lazy to go to their websites and you want to blame me for not giving you the simplest links ever?
Did you press F to doubt when they tried to teach you 1+1 in 1st grade too?
tyler@programming.dev 5 weeks ago
You make a claim, you source it. That’s how debates (and literally any science at all) work dumbass.
Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
No. You source stuff that’s not generally available. Academic papers aren’t out there sourcing the existence of the universe. Asking for easily available stuff to be sourced is a form of trolling.
tyler@programming.dev 4 weeks ago
It clearly isn’t easily available if you can’t even provide a single fucking instance of it now, is it? Sourcing what you’re fucking talking about is how debates work you fucking dickhead. This has nothing to do with a bibliography. It’s about putting a fucking link referencing the material you’re alluding to.